Testing
the RED Post Workflow
Proxies
vs. ProRes, Apple Color & RED and Final Cut Server
Matt Armstrong
May 27, 2008 Source: Studio Daily
|
|
The tapeless revolution is here to
stay. While it can ease production costs and streamline shooting, it means that
many of the duties once handled on set now fall on the shoulders of post
houses, which means they have to reconfigure their business approach,
investments and services. And with the enormous buzz associated with the Red
Camera, post houses are looking to get into the action by providing a sane
workflow for this 4K RAW footage.
The DR Group has been undergoing a digital transformation for many years after
starting out in the ‘90s selling and buying surplus film stock. Seeing
the digital writing on the wall a decade ago it began moving its business to
digital services, investing in Final Cut Pro systems, and offering editorial.
Today it services include online/offline editorial, color correction and
conform as well as consultants for facility design.
With the RED phenomenon, The DR Group has been testing the workflow to come up
with the best, most efficient solutions for RED. We spoke with Lowell Kay,
founder of the DR Group about his companies moves to handle RED workflows and
what their tests have found so far.
How are you formulating a dependable
workflow for such a new format?
The interesting thing about RED is that it keeps evolving, and very quickly.
Assimilate has had a lock on that code for a year but that is now up so the API
for the r3dcode is now available so all the other manufacturers are going to
include it in upcoming releases, which will be pretty exciting.
So what are people today shooting with RED
need to know for the post side?
There are two trains of thought with Red. A lot of people are just using the
proxies with the Red camera, bringing them into Final Cut and editing. That is
great if you are doing feature film, if that film is fairly simple and just has
straight cuts. That’s a fantastic workflow because there is no front end
processing. But it does require an Intel Mac and the latest and greatest
software. You can’t do it on anything below that, it just simply will not
work.
For those that are going to be dealing with a lot of transitions and effects my
suggestion is moving it over to ProRes as you will have a better experience in
the long run just because you have pre-processed it in a sense into a codec
that is more efficient with Final Cut. If you have got one layer, maybe two
layers of video, go for it with the proxies. As soon as you move out of that
and start doing anything besides a linear story I think you really need to look
at processing prior to coming into your edit. And that is where we can come in
and help. We have a lot of computers here and we can do a lot of that pre-processing
to move the project along faster. There’s a lot of people that say they
can do that all on their own, but if you do that you take up your computer and
it takes a lot of time to be able to handle that.
Red workflows require a lot of storage. As a post house we are not going to be
looking at this in terms of just processing power but how are we going to
handle your data management, how are we going to handle your data workflows.
And that is going to be an interesting transition for all post houses. A lot of
people say they can handle it but if they haven’t done this work, if they
haven’t managed projects of these sizes attentive to minute detail, if
they haven’t archived footage, if they don’t have an LTO3 backup
storage, then these will bite you in the ass.
What is your recommendation for handling the
data from on-set and then in post?
You shoot onto the drive and then you are going to transfer that disk in to two
redundant sources or mirror it. Then that has to go to a facility and that
should be archived onto LTO tape and also to a SAN which has redundant RAID 5
storage so you are editing on the footage that may or may not have been
processed. Basically your LTOs become your new film master. That seems to be
robust, it is enterprise level and it’s not going to go away for a while.
Again it depends on what the budget of the feature is. There’s a good,
better, best scenario at all times. Good - do it at your home come to us when
you want to color correction and the final post out. There’s the middle
of the road: we want you to handle this, take it to ProRes and we’ll
finish it in that. Then there’s the ones that want to be able to open
that 4K file, manipulate it and be able to scan it and really go out to film.
The last category is less obviously. 4K is great but 2K is what most people are
looking at. Projectors are 2K except for the Sony and most people doing color
correction are doing it on a 2K image. You may be able to open a 4K image but
you are only able to look at it at 2K.
The key of data management, and this doesn’t matter if it is RED, P2 or
whatever, is retaining the named file. Editors have to get used to the fact
that once they receive the named file that is the name, period. The proxies are
all built off of that main file so if you change the root structure of that
named file then everything else collapses. Same thing happens with P2. If you
change the root structure, it all fails. If you want to sort, use the log
notes. The name of the clip is now less important than the log notes. Once you
process the image they are just 4K DPX files and any color correction system
worth its weight should be able to handle it.
Have you tested color correcting RED footage
and are you using Apple Color for that?
You don’t want to be color correcting these images at the full resolution
in Color. The problem is in a 4:4:4 color space. If you have to do transitions
and you go from Final Cut Pro to Color and then back again there are issues in
that process. That is why we are looking at the major players as far as color
correction: Autodesk, Quantel, Digital Vision and Baselight, we have to find
the solution that offers us the proper roundtrip.
This isn’t just Red. Apple Color is great if you want to roundtrip 4:2:2
between Final Cut and Color and then back. First reason is that when you are
looking in Color you are only seeing a single link; you are never truly seeing
a single link. You have to do a LUT to approximate what the 4:4:4 is going to
look like. That’s the first thing. If you are going to be working on
these files it would be nice to see 4:4:4 log on a consistent basis and from
one source. So if you are 4:2:2 and going between Final Cut and Color there is
no problem because 4:2:2 works in a YUV color space. So when you do any
transitions or any of the final processing, Final Cut Pro reacts properly.
We just did a project where we brought it in 4:4:4 log brought it to Color,
worked in 4:4:4 log but looked at in 4:2:2 brought it back to Final Cut Pro and
anytime we did any processing we had gamma shifts in any transitions. So the
issue is that Final Cut Pro for final output is just not able to handle that
right now. In addition when you use Color you are rendering it in Color, you
bring back those render files into Final Cut Pro and then any transitions you
have to do a render again. Then we find out the transition don’t work. If
you are doing opacity changes or fades or wipes you then have to apply those in
Color, bring those back out as a single clip and then apply it that way. So in
a RED world, especially if you are working in 2K 4:4:4 or 4K 4:4:4, you need to
bring those into a system that is not Final Cut Pro for final output, and
that’s the dirty secret that no one is talking about. So now your cheap
and wonderful color correction, editing, finishing system breaks down. Now you
can do Red Cine, but that doesn’t really give you the full complements of
tools we are used to as post facilities for color correction. It’s good.
For the person that is just working at home to finish their own film it works
great, but is it going to work as efficiently on a professional level? Not
really.
How do you handle the processing and data
management now and will that change?
What we would do is stick it on our SAN and then use RedCine to process it
through multiple computers. RedCine is like using Compressor. One thing that I
am interested to test is Final Cut Server, since the asset management software
is in place, to have all of our RED footage go through Final Cut Server so that
it is tracked and asset managed. From that point if you use that as your
central input station you know where it is on the LTO, you know where it is on
the SAN and the FireWire, so that everything is built into the front end. If we
have Final Cut Server deployed and ready to go we can put this onto a Web page,
there’s review and approval system. There’s just so many things
that it could open up.
www.thedrgroup.com
Sid Rodrigue
Broadcast, Cable TV, and A/V Consultant
E-Mail:
srodrigue@mpi-itec.com
Media Products of Atlanta, Inc.
1235 Old Alpharetta Road, Suite 130
Alpharetta, GA 30005
PHN: 770-772-4252, ext 18
FAX: 770-772-6583
CELL: 770-842-9927
Please pray on this day, and every day, for our patriot Armed Forces
standing in harm's way around the world in the defense of our liberty,
and for the families waiting for their safe return.
|